<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Twitter, Rails, and Scaling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shebanator.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shebanator.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Dynamic Languages, Web Apps, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Studiowhiz.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do you always need a database?</title>
		<link>http://shebanator.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Studiowhiz.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Do you always need a database?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shebanation.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/#comment-245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] saw an interesting update on the Twitter story. One of the best parts though was the link they provided to this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saw an interesting update on the Twitter story. One of the best parts though was the link they provided to this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bell</title>
		<link>http://shebanator.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shebanation.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/more-on-twitter-rails-and-scaling/#comment-244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the mention :-&gt;

Just in case the conversation *does* take a downturn again, I&#039;m not saying Rails or Ruby can&#039;t scale. Only questioning the choice of a language and framework designed to speed development at the cost of performance for an application where performance rather than speed of development is probably the main driver!

Personally I&#039;d prototype Twitter in *insert-cool-dynamic-language-here* and then if performance was an issue, once the interfaces were pretty well locked I&#039;d get a second team to re-code the app using a more performance oriented stack.

I develop a lot using ColdFusion which blends the benefits of dynamic typing with enough OO support, a great set of tag libs and a built in templating language for both templating views and code gen (which is what I&#039;m usually doing).

I wouldn&#039;t hesitate to prototype in CF and then have a team port some or all of an app to a different language if performance was way more important than how quickly I could add new features.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention :-&gt;</p>
<p>Just in case the conversation *does* take a downturn again, I&#8217;m not saying Rails or Ruby can&#8217;t scale. Only questioning the choice of a language and framework designed to speed development at the cost of performance for an application where performance rather than speed of development is probably the main driver!</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;d prototype Twitter in *insert-cool-dynamic-language-here* and then if performance was an issue, once the interfaces were pretty well locked I&#8217;d get a second team to re-code the app using a more performance oriented stack.</p>
<p>I develop a lot using ColdFusion which blends the benefits of dynamic typing with enough OO support, a great set of tag libs and a built in templating language for both templating views and code gen (which is what I&#8217;m usually doing).</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t hesitate to prototype in CF and then have a team port some or all of an app to a different language if performance was way more important than how quickly I could add new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

